央视这次终于做了回好事，龙哥可以安息了
2010版《新流星蝴蝶剑》
目前只看到第九集，故事情节基本按原著，很好很欣慰；不过叙述方式成了顺叙，还能忍，否则以古龙的华丽炫耀度，观众只怕是要看得云里雾里了。于是！后果之一就是，不了解原著的观众对男主的人选绝对会被误导，哈哈，不过这只叶翔确实比小孟帅一点，死的时候应该会尤其帅，认为他是男主的人要伤心了。。。
小蝶在出事前整个一——我多么想用90后这个词，但是决定不侮辱他们了，于是找不到别的名词了，待议——愚蠢脑残无知，害得我差点弃了；幸好出事以后变正常了（那当然，之前都是编剧在脑补，现在可是有古龙支持了！），也挺有书中的凄艳感，只是我记得她是喜欢穿红衣的，电视里都没有；和小孟的几次对话，omg，整个一书中情景重现，太有感觉了，额滴小心脏跳动明显加快。
高老大的bt度比原著有明显下降，不过既然是王艳去演，那就是必然的。。。想当初白飞飞都能被沈浪爱上，这个世界真是太可怕了。
律香川tx是黄嘟嘟演嗒，可惜没有黄嘟嘟帅；嗯，当然黄嘟嘟的帅也是有蒙蒙很大的功劳嗒；孙玉伯长得还没有万鹏王正直，无语。
小孟和叶翔的演员不认识，叶翔和小蝶的感情，我还是自己脑补吧，这里编的太扯了；另外，编剧严重忽略了小蝶对他们的影响，竟然让他们在认识小蝶以前就想离开高老大，这样是不对滴！女主不是拿来摆看滴！
小蝶的孩子是叶翔的，，，，随便了，只要让她还能生就行，原著实在过于残忍了。
小何异常的娘，真可怕。
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
2010年12月29日星期三
2010年10月31日星期日
萍踪·小哇
惊闻萍踪翻拍，小哇之名重现，不由且喜且惧——伊们都为我所爱，不容半点损失- -
不过。。。只是大家的yy罢鸟，演张丹枫的是（即使只是长得，某也坚持认为是）一wsn，小哇是继续被拿来yy的，嗷。。。
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMjE2NTc0MjEy.html
伪片花+剧情提要，很是心潮澎湃啊～～
英宗很可爱，呃，可以考虑去演正德tx呀～ 伊和小哇的眼神交织，啧啧，有爱得很；镜明很pp，赞美；连于承珠都有出场，这就是伪片花的好处了。
小哇的这个扮相应该是来自《少年四大名捕》，伊演的那个很正太的追命，囧，比小顾差了点，于是，来个有小顾的伪片头：
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/RfV8R2Zntjc/
不得不说小顾虽比追命美貌，但气质偏阴暗。然后这版里的石翠风竟然是王艳，，，好大一个龙套。。。伊去演镜明吧。。。蔡少芬太老勒。。。。
说起龙套，不得不说小顾。本以为伊是反一，结果被证明是个龙套，并且所有的反角都是龙套，想来是那段记忆对老温而言过于惨淡了，叹。但伊从原著里最大的龙套之一，一跃成为剧集里的最大亮点，并且颇得老温嘉奖，也不知老温心里作何感想。～～
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
不过。。。只是大家的yy罢鸟，演张丹枫的是（即使只是长得，某也坚持认为是）一wsn，小哇是继续被拿来yy的，嗷。。。
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMjE2NTc0MjEy.html
伪片花+剧情提要，很是心潮澎湃啊～～
英宗很可爱，呃，可以考虑去演正德tx呀～ 伊和小哇的眼神交织，啧啧，有爱得很；镜明很pp，赞美；连于承珠都有出场，这就是伪片花的好处了。
小哇的这个扮相应该是来自《少年四大名捕》，伊演的那个很正太的追命，囧，比小顾差了点，于是，来个有小顾的伪片头：
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/RfV8R2Zntjc/
不得不说小顾虽比追命美貌，但气质偏阴暗。然后这版里的石翠风竟然是王艳，，，好大一个龙套。。。伊去演镜明吧。。。蔡少芬太老勒。。。。
说起龙套，不得不说小顾。本以为伊是反一，结果被证明是个龙套，并且所有的反角都是龙套，想来是那段记忆对老温而言过于惨淡了，叹。但伊从原著里最大的龙套之一，一跃成为剧集里的最大亮点，并且颇得老温嘉奖，也不知老温心里作何感想。～～
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
2010年10月5日星期二
Assignment 2 of Semantic Web
The goal of this assignment is to explore experimental interfaces facilitated by underlying ontologies.
CHIP, E-Culture demo and europeana.
In order to become familiar with the material and the interfaces, think of some questions you would like the answer to. Use the different facilities from the different systems and provide comments on which were helpful and how.
Write down two questions whose answer requires linking more than two pieces of information.
Comment on the best and worst aspects of the very different interfaces of these sites.
The report should be aimed at fellow designers who need to create a new interface for the information available. Argue for which features (functions/interface elements) should be kept. What should be improved, and how. Is there other functionality you would like to see added?
Two questions whose answers require linking more than two pieces of information:
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
CHIP, E-Culture demo and europeana.
In order to become familiar with the material and the interfaces, think of some questions you would like the answer to. Use the different facilities from the different systems and provide comments on which were helpful and how.
Write down two questions whose answer requires linking more than two pieces of information.
Comment on the best and worst aspects of the very different interfaces of these sites.
The report should be aimed at fellow designers who need to create a new interface for the information available. Argue for which features (functions/interface elements) should be kept. What should be improved, and how. Is there other functionality you would like to see added?
Two questions whose answers require linking more than two pieces of information:
1. What style(s) of paintings might interest me?
On the homepage of CHIP, I found 'the Threatened Swan' interest, whose style is Baroque. So I clicked 'Baroque' style, but nothing appeared. Anyway, the system suggest some other paintings, among which I found several ones that I like, such as 'Still Life with a Golden Goblet' and 'Winter Landscape with Iceskaters', also have the Baroque style. Well, then I would suppose that I am interested in this style. Still I want to know what Baroque style is, but CHIP shows nothing, e-culture shows almost nothing, and europeana gives some examples but no explanation. I need wikipedia at this moment.
2.It is possible for me to like Bembrandt?
After viewing some of his paintings, I found it hard to say. I like the way in which he used brushes and sometimes the colors, but I'm not interested in what he painted: the portraits and the dead peacock.
After viewing some of his paintings, I found it hard to say. I like the way in which he used brushes and sometimes the colors, but I'm not interested in what he painted: the portraits and the dead peacock.
I like that CHIP shows some very famous artworks on Homepage, and once users rate, other pieces will be recommended based on shared features. It's easy for those who are not familiar with either this museum or arts to explore. However, it doesn't always work well. For example, I like the 'use of color' feature, but only bright/colorful/cheerful/peaceful colors, not those dark/gloomy/depressive colors, which could not be distinguished by the system yet.
I also like the fact that CHIP helps to guide users to their favourite/recommended artworks. It is especially useful for those who have only limited time, or in huge museums like Louvre.
The pop-up in CHIP is very nice, too. The artworks, the artists, the lists are all poped up which enable the users not to lose tracks: it's much easier to close the pop-ups than to go back, since going back takes time to load the webpage and sometimes they just don't go back. However, the pop-ups sometimes are not so well. The pop-ups only appear at the top of the web page, but not where users are looking at. If they are at the bottom or anywhere but not the top, and they click,
the pop-up pop up, but at the top,
then they will not see it and probably miss it.
Though CHIP is very good for tourists, it's not systemic enough I would say. It doesn't explain Baroque for instance, except the fact that link of Baroque links to nothing. Another thing to improve is the rating itself: the rows of stars should be put more carefully.
The layout of e-culture is quite poor to me. Most of the space is empty, and the important text and images are confined in a very narrow column, which is even worse than my blog, whose narrow column is at least in the middle ^_^.
On the contrast, the information in europeana is listed horizontally. It's a bit strange to see things moving horizontally when I click 'next page' thing, I would say. Would it be a good idea to expand vertically? Besides the horizontal change, it seems that only 'next page' and 'previous page' links work. When I try to go to pages rather than those two, only the blank shows up. Nevertheless, there is no wasted space in either case, which is much better than e-culture.
About the information, I'd like to combine the e-culture and europeana. The former one gives examples of artworks without description, while the later gives both but in a very narrow column.
One thing I cannot understand about e-culture is the rma_works.rdf and rma_people.rdf links: why they always link to empty pages and they always appear there?
I also like the fact that CHIP helps to guide users to their favourite/recommended artworks. It is especially useful for those who have only limited time, or in huge museums like Louvre.
The pop-up in CHIP is very nice, too. The artworks, the artists, the lists are all poped up which enable the users not to lose tracks: it's much easier to close the pop-ups than to go back, since going back takes time to load the webpage and sometimes they just don't go back. However, the pop-ups sometimes are not so well. The pop-ups only appear at the top of the web page, but not where users are looking at. If they are at the bottom or anywhere but not the top, and they click,
no pop-up?
the pop-up pop up, but at the top,
but on the top
then they will not see it and probably miss it.
Though CHIP is very good for tourists, it's not systemic enough I would say. It doesn't explain Baroque for instance, except the fact that link of Baroque links to nothing. Another thing to improve is the rating itself: the rows of stars should be put more carefully.
The layout of e-culture is quite poor to me. Most of the space is empty, and the important text and images are confined in a very narrow column, which is even worse than my blog, whose narrow column is at least in the middle ^_^.
On the contrast, the information in europeana is listed horizontally. It's a bit strange to see things moving horizontally when I click 'next page' thing, I would say. Would it be a good idea to expand vertically? Besides the horizontal change, it seems that only 'next page' and 'previous page' links work. When I try to go to pages rather than those two, only the blank shows up. Nevertheless, there is no wasted space in either case, which is much better than e-culture.
About the information, I'd like to combine the e-culture and europeana. The former one gives examples of artworks without description, while the later gives both but in a very narrow column.
One thing I cannot understand about e-culture is the rma_works.rdf and rma_people.rdf links: why they always link to empty pages and they always appear there?
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
2010年10月4日星期一
Assignment 1 of Semantic Web
The assignment we have for today is to:
Explore
the Rijksmuseum collection,
Louvre,
europeana.
and write an analysis (a brief description of what you are discussing, along with the advantages and the disadvantages) of the following:
Given the information available from these three sites, how would you want to access all the information?
Write down one or two questions whose answer requires information from at least two of the sites.
Write down an example of extra information you would want that is not available from these three sites.
Since I'm not familiar with artworks, especially occidental artworks, though interested in, it took me a bit long to explore these websites, and hopefully I can get some ideas about their information providing and structures.
The first two websites to me are more or less like the web portal: they put those important and/or interesting items on the homepage, they have category to access probably all the items that they have, and they provide search function but only at corners. Although they're similar in this sense, there are lots of differences. One of the most distinct ones is how they classify their artworks. Louvre follows a very traditional way, I would say, based on regions, time, styles, etc. There's no related items listed by one item, but all listed on lists, such as Italian Paintings. And the 'next page' would lead to the next item listed on one of those lists.
On the other hand, Rijksmuseum is more like a dictionary: it has index of artists, encyclopedia and objects. If the user has a particular purpose, it's easy to find things useful; otherwise, people like me would feel lost and even despaired. It also has a catalogue, which I followed as: catalogue - paintings - Main subject: People -
But a big but, none of them has anything! Why they fool me like this? One more thing, there's no homepage hyperlike in lots of its webpages. What a mass.
The Europeana website is different from those two. It's mostly a database with a search engine. Users do have to know what to search so that they can reach the information, nevertherless, at least they wouldn't do those stupid things as I just did. The information is quite limited, saying the title, creator, provider, related items, etc. Here the related items are explicitly shown.
I thought several stupid questions, like 'what genres are there of paintings, and what are their features?', 'why people consider Mona Lisa/De Nachtwacht as good paintings?' The first one I could hardly find out. I only know impressionism, and could find it and its features on Rijksmuseum, but no way for others. I don't know their names. And when I searched for 'genre' in all three websites, nothing reasonable or understandable showed up.
The Mona Lisa question is answered quite ok, though the process is not so easy. There's a picture of Mona Lisa at the homepage, and it's easy to simply click it, which leads to the discription. But this description is quite short, to understand more, it's easier to search, because you wouldn't want to follow this: Home - Collection - Curatorial Departments - Paintings - Selected Works - Italian Painting - destination. But even searching has its own problem. As the most famous painting, how can the wanted result be listed at the fifth place?
But for De Nachtwacht, the description is only in Dutch! I don't mean to offensive, but I could not imagine that the description of Mona Lisa is only in Franch. I feel quite frustrated indeed, and could not explore much about the relations among items. Sorry for it.
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
Explore
the Rijksmuseum collection,
Louvre,
europeana.
and write an analysis (a brief description of what you are discussing, along with the advantages and the disadvantages) of the following:
- information provided;
- navigational structure of the site:
- how is information grouped,
- how are the relations among different pieces of information made clear,
- how does a user find related information;
Given the information available from these three sites, how would you want to access all the information?
Write down one or two questions whose answer requires information from at least two of the sites.
Write down an example of extra information you would want that is not available from these three sites.
Since I'm not familiar with artworks, especially occidental artworks, though interested in, it took me a bit long to explore these websites, and hopefully I can get some ideas about their information providing and structures.
The first two websites to me are more or less like the web portal: they put those important and/or interesting items on the homepage, they have category to access probably all the items that they have, and they provide search function but only at corners. Although they're similar in this sense, there are lots of differences. One of the most distinct ones is how they classify their artworks. Louvre follows a very traditional way, I would say, based on regions, time, styles, etc. There's no related items listed by one item, but all listed on lists, such as Italian Paintings. And the 'next page' would lead to the next item listed on one of those lists.
On the other hand, Rijksmuseum is more like a dictionary: it has index of artists, encyclopedia and objects. If the user has a particular purpose, it's easy to find things useful; otherwise, people like me would feel lost and even despaired. It also has a catalogue, which I followed as: catalogue - paintings - Main subject: People -
The Europeana website is different from those two. It's mostly a database with a search engine. Users do have to know what to search so that they can reach the information, nevertherless, at least they wouldn't do those stupid things as I just did. The information is quite limited, saying the title, creator, provider, related items, etc. Here the related items are explicitly shown.
I thought several stupid questions, like 'what genres are there of paintings, and what are their features?', 'why people consider Mona Lisa/De Nachtwacht as good paintings?' The first one I could hardly find out. I only know impressionism, and could find it and its features on Rijksmuseum, but no way for others. I don't know their names. And when I searched for 'genre' in all three websites, nothing reasonable or understandable showed up.
The Mona Lisa question is answered quite ok, though the process is not so easy. There's a picture of Mona Lisa at the homepage, and it's easy to simply click it, which leads to the discription. But this description is quite short, to understand more, it's easier to search, because you wouldn't want to follow this: Home - Collection - Curatorial Departments - Paintings - Selected Works - Italian Painting - destination. But even searching has its own problem. As the most famous painting, how can the wanted result be listed at the fifth place?
But for De Nachtwacht, the description is only in Dutch! I don't mean to offensive, but I could not imagine that the description of Mona Lisa is only in Franch. I feel quite frustrated indeed, and could not explore much about the relations among items. Sorry for it.
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
2010年6月9日星期三
一下死了好多
荀令：太高调了，剧组果然不能理解文若对both曹公and汉室深沉的爱；连焚稿断痴情这么美且狗血的桥段都删了，却来了一出揉碎桃花红满地，硬把林黛玉掰成了尤三姐，算他狠！
关羽：爱咋死咋死；不过有人说让他自杀会让小孩子误解历史，俺只好闷笑。
蒙蒙：江东大嘟嘟们英年早逝的传统果然吓着剧组了，他们继续不能理解古代南蛮之地的恶劣条件，以曹营将领的平均寿命来期待江东，只好让蒙蒙死于非命了。可怜的权君，他对蒙蒙本是怀有多么热切的爱的呀（题头图：有星星眼的蒙蒙）！
曹公：这个稍微正常一点了；可惜这个痞版曹不会分香卖履；不过也算了，鉴于他反正已经不能与会留香的某人交相辉映～～～了。
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
2010年6月5日星期六
新三过半，随便说说
导演疑似魏控：桃园结义给的镜头还不如曹操一泡尿；可是强大的曹营得到的体现不足三成：曹操整个一流氓地痞状，荀令被多人合体，嘉嘉无疾而终，惇哥也酱油了，唯独小懿子给的镜头很足（连带着陈群都沾光了，囧，公达都只能在对白里飘过啊！！！），可惜他跟丕殿让人饭不起来。
导演同时疑似蜀黑：虽然某对荀君的形象很不满，不过看到单缝关和李逵张时，俺。。。。不由得心平气和了。刘备的腹黑和枭雄状很不错，很不错；不过据说无情剑一出，雷倒一街人啊。庞统的形象俺看着很是欢喜：只有长成这样，才不怪刘备没起色心（咳，某太不含蓄了）。某亮平平（只是突然发现原来他是个大叔控）；云妹是聂远迄今为止被我看到的他最好的造型。看来导演对蜀汉是爱恨交加，和曹操对大耳一个样？
然后！亮点！！！那是东吴啊东吴～～ 孙权是个渣，这是个不争的事实；可志里只给了渣的事实，演义不能理解渣的格局，唯有新三，给这个渣找出了一个爱的理由～～～！！！53，嘟嘟一片心血都是为了伯符，却竟然被他那个渣弟拿来做文章——这难道不是因爱生恨吗？——555，还好有蒙蒙（他的星星眼太炫了，嗷嗷），小霸王死不瞑目啊！！！鲁肃很出彩，那种大概可以叫做霸气的老实，呃，难怪孙权也就对他不渣。
总的来说，拍成这样委实对不起砸进去的那些钱；不过新三的亮点还是很明显的：把大耳和鲁肃还原成了《志》里的形象；孙权的（渣攻）形象大为丰满；东吴的cp很有爱呀很有爱～～ 目前看来俺至少会追到蒙蒙挂掉——据说孙权在此又渣了！
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
导演同时疑似蜀黑：虽然某对荀君的形象很不满，不过看到单缝关和李逵张时，俺。。。。不由得心平气和了。刘备的腹黑和枭雄状很不错，很不错；不过据说无情剑一出，雷倒一街人啊。庞统的形象俺看着很是欢喜：只有长成这样，才不怪刘备没起色心（咳，某太不含蓄了）。某亮平平（只是突然发现原来他是个大叔控）；云妹是聂远迄今为止被我看到的他最好的造型。看来导演对蜀汉是爱恨交加，和曹操对大耳一个样？
然后！亮点！！！那是东吴啊东吴～～ 孙权是个渣，这是个不争的事实；可志里只给了渣的事实，演义不能理解渣的格局，唯有新三，给这个渣找出了一个爱的理由～～～！！！53，嘟嘟一片心血都是为了伯符，却竟然被他那个渣弟拿来做文章——这难道不是因爱生恨吗？——555，还好有蒙蒙（他的星星眼太炫了，嗷嗷），小霸王死不瞑目啊！！！鲁肃很出彩，那种大概可以叫做霸气的老实，呃，难怪孙权也就对他不渣。
总的来说，拍成这样委实对不起砸进去的那些钱；不过新三的亮点还是很明显的：把大耳和鲁肃还原成了《志》里的形象；孙权的（渣攻）形象大为丰满；东吴的cp很有爱呀很有爱～～ 目前看来俺至少会追到蒙蒙挂掉——据说孙权在此又渣了！
© 非商业性转载，请署作者名并给出链接。商业性使用，请联系作者。
订阅：
博文 (Atom)
博文
